Tech

Many cores and high frequencies, but CPU performance remains stagnant

Share
Share

To evaluate CPU performance, the most reliable approach is not to check its specifications but to analyze real-world tests conducted by users with specialized software. One of the most popular tools for this is PassMark, which collects and analyzes test results to measure processor performance.

Since 2004, PassMark has been tracking the evolution of CPU performance based on this data. Over the years, both laptop and desktop processors have shown consistent improvements, even during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, this trend has recently stagnated and has even started to decline, especially in laptops.

PassMark has released an updated chart showing the evolution of processor performance from 2004 to February 2025. It is important to note that this data reflects the performance of devices used by users running PassMark’s software, not just the latest CPUs on the market.

For desktop computers, performance has declined by 0.5%. In 2024, a total of 186,053 devices were analyzed, with an average score of 26,426 points. In the first months of 2025, the average score of the 47,810 evaluated devices has dropped to 26,311 points.

On the other hand, the most significant decline has been recorded in laptops, with a year-over-year decrease of 3.4%. In 2024, data was collected from 101,316 devices, with an average score of 16,632 points. So far in 2025, after analyzing 25,541 devices, the average score has fallen to 14,130 points.

Another PassMark chart shows the evolution of CPU performance since 2008. Starting in 2023, the curve has remained virtually unchanged, indicating that processors released in recent years have provided only minimal improvements compared to previous generations.

The biggest performance jump between 2022 and 2023 in desktop computers was due to the AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 7995W, featuring 96 cores and 192 threads. In laptops, the Ryzen 9 7945HX3D was the main driver of performance gains.

However, the new Ryzen 9000 and Intel Core Ultra 200 series have shown only marginal improvements over their predecessors, offering performance levels similar to Qualcomm’s chips in the laptop segment.

The lack of significant advancements in Intel and AMD architectures is one of the main factors limiting performance evolution in both desktops and laptops. PassMark suggests that one possible reason for this stagnation is a shift in user preferences, with more people prioritizing power efficiency over raw performance. It also points to Windows 11 as a potential contributing factor.

When the Ryzen 9000 series was launched, its performance on Windows 11 was noticeably lower than on Linux-based systems, an issue that was later resolved through joint optimizations by Microsoft and AMD.

Share
Related Articles
Tech

MSI won’t sell the AMD Radeon RX 9000—another EVGA-like case?

Many hardware companies strive to bring the latest components to market, aiming...

Tech

NVIDIA tries to ease criticism over the distribution of GeForce RTX 50, but its response is unconvincing

Weeks after its launch, it is still difficult to find a GeForce...

Tech

Windows 10 is nearing its end, and Google is already encouraging us to choose its alternative

The end of Windows 10 is approaching quickly, and starting in October,...

Tech

ASUS will manufacture the new portable Xbox console

In recent years, some of the leading hardware brands have been investing...

Tech

TSMC is ready to take control of Intel’s chip factories, but it doesn’t want to do it alone

The Trump administration has requested TSMC’s help in rescuing Intel’s semiconductor factories,...

Tech

Sony caught using AI in PlayStation characters

More and more companies are looking to integrate artificial intelligence into their...

Tech

Social media platform X experiences global outage, Elon Musk claims it’s a cyberattack

After X’s global outage, Elon Musk used his profile on the platform...